
Borates
|
|
BBO
|
LBO - LB4
|
| BIBO |
| CLBO |
KDP - KD*P
|
Oxydes
|
| KNbO3 |
| LiNbO3 |
KTP-KTA- RTP
|
LiIO3
|
Chalcogenides
|
AgGaS2
|
AgGaSe2
|
GaSe
|
LiInS2
|
LiInSe2
|





|
|

Monolithic
Optically Contacted
WalkOff-Compensating Structures
(2N-OCWOC)

1.
|
What is birefringence walkoff ?
Phase-matching
(PM) in three-wave mixing \chi^(2)
parametric processes requires that the phase-velocities (vi
= c/ni) of the interacting waves are
matched. Due to normal material dispersion, this condition can be
satisfied only in birefringent nonlinear media (with allowed eigenmode polarizations
for the E-fields), along a direction \theta of propagation (PM
direction) with respect to the optical cristallo-physical frame. For
non-zero PM angle, the "extraordinary" energy or ray path Se
(blue, E-field in the plane of figure) walks-off the corresponding
wavevector ke (yellow, E-field perpendicular) by a
double-refraction (or walkoff) angle \rho. This phenomenon
results in poor overlap between
the interacting rays and elliptic
beam shape for the generated e-wave.
|
|

Representation
of PM (in terms of the index ellipsoids) in a birefringent material at
an angle \theta from the optic axis (c).
|
2.
3.
|
Principle
of walkoff compensation
The following figures
show how walkoff can be compensated, starting from a bulk element, for
type-I and type-II coupling among the 3 interacting waves. The figure
can refer for instance to a second-harmonic generation (SHG) of a
yellow laser to the blue-UV.
BULK crystal: in type-I
coupling, the SH wave is stretched in the walkoff plane, yielding a
highly elliptical beam, while in type-II poor overlap of the two
fundamental orthogonally polarized waves limit the interaction length.
|
Type-I (ooe)
|
|
Type-II
(oeo)
|
|
|

Fig. 1a
|
|

Fig. 2a
|
|
2-OCWOC tandem:
the bulk crystal is cut into two halves (N=1), arranged in the WOC
configuration and optically adhered (and eventually diffusion bonded).
Transverse beam profile re-symmetrization occurs (type-I) together with
conversion efficiency enhancement due to the increase in interaction
length.
|
|

Fig. 1b
|
|

Fig. 2b
|
|
2N-OCWOC
periodic
structure
8-OCWOC structure:
the bulk crystal is cut into 8 plates (N=4) arranged in the WOC
configuration. The e-wave is birefringence-guided along the
polarization wave, achieving full overlap leading to
several times enhanced energy conversion and full SH beam reshaping
toward a circular Gaussian beam.
|
|
Type-I (ooe) |
|
Type-II
(oeo) |
|
|

Fig. 1c
|
|

Fig. 2c
|
|
|
4.
|
Benefit in terms of conversion
efficiency and beam profile
For
second-harmonic generation (SHG) the power conversion efficiency
of 2N-OCWOC devices can be expressed as function of the
focusing waist w0 and the walkoff parameter B :
|
|
with
|
 |
|
The following figures shows, e.g., the SH efficiency enhancement and
transverse beam profile re-symmetrization brought by 2N-OCWOC (N=1 and N=4) with BBO phase-matched
for type-I(ooe) SHG of a 570nm dye laser. The case of a struture length
Lc = 8mm is considered and compared with the case a a bulk
non WOC crystal (yellow curves). For this parametric process, walkoff
is as large as \rho=4.8°.
|

|

|

|
|
|
Tuning curves for Bulk, 2-OCWOC
and 8-OCWOC tandems of identical lengths. At optimum phase-mismatch, a x2 enhancement (x7) is expected
for a 2-plate (8-plate) tandem as compared with a bulk sample.
|
|
Transverse beam shape
re-symmetrization in the walkoff plane, as the pairing number N
is increased. The dashed line corrresponds to
the profile in the walkoff unaffected direction.
|
|
NB:
The enhancement in type-II parametric processes is superior to
type-I because the gain in overlap between the two
cross-polarized fundamental waves is greater (Fig. 2b).
Experimentally, an efficiency
enhancement by x22 into the green has been observed with a
10-OCWOC type-II KTP structure (see picture below) for the SHG at
1064nm.
|

|

|
|
|
 |
|
Conversion efficiency versus
focusing for a bulk KTP (h0), 4-OCWOC (h2) and 10-OCWOC
structure (h5) , all with Lc=10mm, |
|
The practical design of 2N-OCWOC
structures is a very delicate task. In addition to the mechanical
processing, it requires the accurate knowledge of the wavelengths
involved in the 3-wave mixing process, and a preliminary test of
angular phase-matching direction using a test bulk sample, because
enhancement depends on how near from normal incidence the structure is
designed for.
|
5.
|
When to apply for 2N-OCWOC
structures ?
These periodic structures are
particularly usefull for blue-UV
(SHG of visible lasers) and mid-IR
generation (DFG or OPOs), because no periodically-poled (PP) materials
are available
in the extreme range of the optical spectrum. Due to the low loss
at the optical contact boundaries, they can be used inside enhancement
resonators (only the end facets need to be AR coated). In the UV, BBO is the
only material of choice owing to its largest nonlinearity and
transmission among the oxo-borates. Among the BBO 2N-OCWOC
potential applications:
- cw blue-UV powerful laser sources
(200 - 400 nm) for atom cooling and trapping
- 3rd harmonic generation (THG)
using cascaded crystals (OCWOC for the 1st SHG, follwed by the
sum-frequency crystal)
- Optical
parametric oscillation with critically phase-matched birefringent NLO
crystals (reduced threshold by the walkoff cancellation)
- Optical Parametric
Chirped Pulse
Amplification
|
In the mid-IR, AgGaS2 can be used to cancel the
walkoff effect in optical parametric oscillators (OPOs) .
2N-OCWOC structures can also
overcome the aperture limitations of PP materials when high energy
pulsed lasers are used, or to lower the oscillation threshold of cw
OPOs.
|
6.
|
Bibliography
[1] - J.-J.
Zondy, M. Abed, S. Khodja, C. Bonnin, B.
Rainaud, H. Albrecht, D. Lupinski, Walkoff-compensated
type-I and type-II SHG
using twin-crystal AgGaSe2 and KTiOPO4 devices,
Proc. SPIE 2700
66 (1996).
[2] - J.-J. Zondy, C. Bonnin, D. Lupinski, Second-harmonic generation with monolithic
walk-off-compensating periodic structures. I. Theory, J.
Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1675
(2003).
[3] - J.-J. Zondy, D. Kolker, C. Bonnin, D. Lupinski, Second-harmonic generation with monolithic
walk-off-compensating periodic structures. II. Experiments,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1695
(2003).
[4] - S. Carrasco, D.V.
Petrov, J.P. Torres, L.
Torner, H. Kim, G. Stegeman, J.-J. Zondy, Observation of self-trapping
of light in walk-off compensating tandems, Opt.
Lett. 29, 382 (2004).
[5] - J. P. Fève, J.-J. Zondy, B. Boulanger, R. Bonnenberger, X.
Cabirol, B. Ménaert, G. Marnier, Optimized blue light generation in
optically contacted walkoff-compensated RbTiOAsO4 and KTiOP1-yAsyO4
,’’ Opt. Commun. 161, 359
(1999).
[6] - M. Vaupel, A. Maitre, C. Fabre, Observation of pattern formation in an
optical parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5278 (1999).
[7] - R. F. Wu, P. B. Phua, K. S. Lai, Y. L. Lim, E. Lau, A. Chang, C.
Bonnin, D. Lupinski, ‘‘Compact 21-W 2-um intracavity
optical parametric oscillator,’’ Opt. Lett. 25, 1460 (2000).
|
|